Showing posts with label Gender Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender Rights. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Recent Popular Articles


My Recent Articles in Feminist Channels

A Mani



Feminism in India:

A. Mani: “Microaggressions - The Small Things about Gender, Sex and Sexuality”, April 2020

Feminism in India:

A. Mani: “Sexism in the Science Experiment”, March 2020

The Life of Sciences:

A. Mani: “Being a Lesbian Trans Woman of Science in India”, October 2019

I received the Orange Flower Award for this article on LGBTQ Issues (for women writers).

The Life of Sciences:

A Mani and Sayani Basak: “Explainer: Mental Health Issues Faced by LTQ Women of Science”, October 2019

Feminism in India:

A Mani: “How To Fight Sexism And Queerphobia In STEM”, February 2019
Article Link

 _____________________________________________________________

Rate my blog at Susan's Place Trans Resources
 

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Reflections on the 14th Kolkata Rainbow Pride Walk



Kolkata Rainbow Pride Walk happened on the 13th of  December'2015. Over 2000 people participated in the walk that spanned a distance of about 6 km. The clouds had covered the Sun, but the weather was hot and a bit unpleasant in mid-December. Ideally we want the weather to be pleasant at all times.

We are also fighting for basic primitive rights like decriminalisation of human sexuality and for improving our support base. So most of the slogans and messages conveyed were of a basic nature.

The participation reflected the impact of the patriarchy and related discriminatory forces. Majority of the participants were women and most of them, in my opinion (am a femme lesbian), were butch. Lesbians formed a substantial part of the participation. At least some of them were not members of rights groups, but went all the way to create their own posters - this strategy appeared to be Zapatist in essence. Not surprisingly a substantial number of lesbians were in the 18--30 age group.  I can say this much because I was at various positions of the moving group, observed the gender expression and other parameters of many participants, also made new lesbian friends, did not have to carry posters/flags for more than 10 minutes, and could compute with collected data.  

Vocal slogans were in Bengali (local language).  The structure of one of these slogans translates into "I am in love with a woman. Everything about the love is well justified and morally correct. " (followed by analogous versions for other sexualities).

Apparently nobody brought enough of specific pride flags. Only rainbow flags and colours were on display. That seems odd especially when other issues of intersectionality like caste and tolerance were addressed. We should bring out all the colours in future.

People of various gender identities were present at the event. But labels were missing - that is the wrong strategy to use. One cannot guess the gender identity of a person unless the person's gender expression is coherent with their identity relative society. To break stereotypical associations, it is necessary to demonstrate the associations between identity, expression and sexuality - at least in reports in the media. This is particularly important because most of the public have poor understanding of gender identities and the concepts of gender identity, expression and sexualities are functionally interdependent.

Some of the messages being conveyed were of the form "we want to differ a bit from the decadent prescriptions of normal behaviour". Then there was this reflection by a participant about the event being so nice in the context of the perennial hate that they had been experiencing in life. These expressions concern concept formation in possible schemes of understanding human rights.

I therefore guess, the grounds of solidarity across such a wide spectrum were in:
This land is not ours, it does not belong
This water is not ours, it does not belong
This air is not ours, it does not belong.


__________________________________________________________________________



Rate my blog at Susan's Place Trans Resources

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

On Functional Aspects of the SC Judgement


This is about the SC judgement (delivered on the 15th of April'2014) on Writ Petition (Civil) No.400 of 2012 filed by NALSA against the Union of India and Others. On the whole the judgement is a step in the right direction. I take a look at the best possible way to implement it in what follows. For background material see the references below.

It is very important that the rules/ methods and procedures of the implementation be simple and straightforward. This is because the bureaucracy (in particular) has never had suitable training on gender issues or sex education. To hit the nail on the head, an essential universal instruction that should be adopted by all state governments is the following (as per page 20-21 of the judgement):

If any Indian citizen wants to change their  gender assigned at birth, then they are permitted to do  so by filing a gender affidavit* indicating their preferred gender (from any of the three legally recognized ones). No additional medical certificates or endorsement/clearance by third parties (including relatives) need be furnished for the procedure.


(* A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it, before a notary or officer having authority to administer oaths.)


It is for people to live as they like in their gender of choice. If they are not allowed to, then it amounts to a crime committed on them by sections of society - that is about it. Trans woman may choose to identify as "women" or as "third gender", trans men may opt for identifying as "men" or "third gender" and most indigenous genders and other gender diverse people as "third gender".  Most transsexuals follow a binary perspective when it comes to specifying their own gender identity, but all of them do not some may have issues with "passing". All transsexuals do not transition in the same way and to the same degree of completion - whatever that means. Those are some reasons for the options.  Ideally we should permit people to use any label they desire, but the scope of the judgement is limited. 

It is important that the existing laws on marriage be changed to accommodate relationships between people of any genders. A majority of trans women are lesbians or are bisexual, most trans men tend to be gay or bisexual (see [b], for example). Often these people may be in conventional marriages before transition and these are bound to get into legal complications after transition. All this is further complicated by the general taboo against same-sex relationships in India. Then again people of other genders do marry with other genders in other ways. My personal view is that the state should not concern itself with the subject of marriage in the first place. But if it chooses to, then it should stop its grotesque discriminatory practices.

The SC ruling has directives on protecting the rights of trans people and people of indigenous gender in particular. Proper implementation requires that we have suitable infrastructure, personnel and universal sex and gender education. Of course, that is apart from basic benefits like free medical care, preferential access to education and sustainable living tracts. It is implicit in the ruling that State Governments are obligated to provide all of the benefits. I am not too sure about the extent to which they will dare to violate the implicit guidelines.



 

References



      [bComprehensive Study on Orientation of Transsexuals 

_________________________________________________________________________

All Rights Reserved, Copyright A. Mani' 2014

__________________________________________________________________________